It’ll take a year or three of intensive debate, but a major tax overhaul is a good bet. By Peter Blank, Editor August 17, 2010 Come this fall, Congress faces a big fight over whether (and for how long) to extend the Bush tax cuts. Further down the road, though, a much bigger tax reform battle awaits: A complete overhaul of individual and business taxes. It won’t happen quickly -- probably not until after the 2012 presidential election -- but the preliminary skirmishing is already beginning.A bipartisan proposal offered by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) bears watching. It will undoubtedly change in all sorts of ways as the debate proceeds, but it’ll give you a good idea of what lawmakers are planning. Sponsored Content For starters, the Wyden-Gregg plan would cut the number of tax brackets in half, from six to three. Couples would pay 15% on their first $75,000 of taxable income, then 25% on the next $65,000 and then 35% over $140,000. Currently, the 35% tax bracket starts at $373,650. The rate brackets for singles would be half of those for couples. While the brackets would be indexed to inflation, the adjustments would be lower than they are now. Standard deductions would soar: $30,000 for married couples, $15,000 for singles and $22,500 for heads of households. Far fewer filers would benefit from itemizing. Advertisement Three hidden tax increases would be nixed: The alternative minimum tax plus the itemized deduction and personal exemption cutbacks for upper incomers. On dividends and long-term gains, a 35% exclusion would be allowed, making the top rate 22.75%. Filers could also exclude 35% of up to $500,000 of gains on the sales of assets that were held between six months and one year. Municipal bonds would be less tax favored. The exemption for interest on newly issued bonds would be replaced with a tax credit for 25% of the interest. Municipal bond funds would report separately to investors on newly issued bonds. The income tax base would be broadened by eliminating many tax breaks: Flexible spending plans for health and dependent care. Miscellaneous itemizations. The exclusion for foreign earned income. Moving expenses. Deferring interest on newly issued savings bonds. Taxing fringes such as group-term life, employer provided meals and lodging and employee awards. Advertisement The net effect: A tax hike of over $200 billion on individuals over 10 years. For businesses: Corporations would pay tax at a flat 24% rate, down from the 35% maximum rate under current law, a significant reduction. And small firms could expense all equipment and inventory purchases. To qualify, a company’s average annual gross receipts could not exceed $1 million. Larger companies would have to take depreciation over longer periods. Some tax breaks would be axed: The deduction for domestic production. Use of the installment method by nondealers. Completed-contract accounting. Plus techniques to defer the business income of controlled foreign subsidiaries. And deductions firms claim for interest paid on debt would be reduced by inflation. The bottom line is a net tax cut of $200 billion or so for businesses. Advertisement The proposal is a good indicator of the challenges ahead on tax reform. Lawmakers won’t be able to sell the public on a business tax cut funded by tax hikes on individuals. That significantly dims the prospects for a deep corporate rate cut. Any tax overhaul is likely to be revenue neutral for individuals and businesses, or to contain a small net hike on corporations to fund tax reduction for individuals.