Bonds are no riskier today than they were a year ago. If you own them for current income and diversification, stand firm. By Jeffrey R. Kosnett, Senior Editor From Kiplinger's Personal Finance, July 2014 So far in 2014, the following income-paying investment categories are in the black, with returns ranging up to 10%: U.S. government debt of all maturities. Investment-grade corporate and municipal bonds of all maturities. Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities. Junk bonds. Emerging-markets bonds. Real estate investment trusts. Utility stocks. Preferred stocks.See Also: Kiplinger's Interest Rate Outlook And the following fixed-income classes are in the red so far this year: [this space intentionally left blank]. Sponsored Content So much for the bond bears and interest-rate scolds who have been warning that higher yields will decimate fixed-income portfolios. On the contrary, this is shaping up as an excellent year for anyone who owns interest-paying investments with longer maturities than Treasury bills, bank deposits and money market funds. And the sun will shine the rest of this year and into 2015. Yes, Kiplinger’s expects the economy to improve, with gross domestic product growing at an annual rate of close to 3% later this year. So interest rates might creep up a bit; the yield on ten-year Treasuries, 2.6% today, could go to 3% and stick (yields and returns are through April 30). But such a move would be trivial when put up against all the anti-bond agitprop that still litters Wall Street and the Internet. Advertisement In plain English, my message is that your bonds and bond substitutes are fine. Bonds are no riskier today than they were a year ago. If you own them for current income and diversification, stand firm. That’s the opposite of what you hear from major investment firms and their celebrity strategists. (My colleague Anne Smith reports that all of her Wall Street contacts say to “underweight” fixed income.) My view also likely contradicts that of your own adviser, who probably urged you a year ago to steel yourself for rapidly rising rates (and declines in the value of your bond holdings). Can this pattern reverse itself on a dime? In my view, almost certainly not. People are satisfied with current levels of income, inflation is almost nonexistent, government finances are improving, corporate balance sheets are in great shape, and the dollar is strong. Even if the Federal Reserve pumps up short-term rates all the way to 1% (from near 0% today), I doubt that investors will stampede into savings accounts, CDs and money market funds. Bear trap. So, gang, why are the bond bears trapped in their belief that rising rates are inevitable? In my view, their case for an upturn is based on nothing more substantial than, Hey, rates used to be higher, so eventually they must return to higher levels. But a critical question arises: Exactly what in the real world stands to put the cost of credit on an elevator in 2014 or 2015? You can’t argue that money is tight. Credit is a commodity, and the nation and the world are swimming in cash. Although the Federal Reserve has cut back on its bond-buying, it’s still putting more credit into play monthly. The Treasury borrows trillions but sells bonds easily. Whenever corporations or municipalities offer new debt, buyers rush in. Advertisement Plus, borrowers won’t pay any more. In this year’s first quarter, the dollar amount of U.S. mortgage originations, including refinancing, fell by an amazing 58% from the same period a year earlier and by 23% from the last quarter of 2013. This slowdown came about because 30-year mortgage rates crested at close to 4.5%—more than the housing market was willing to bear. And car loan and credit card interest rates are no higher than they were a year earlier. Finally, banks and other lenders have no reason to pay higher rates to bring in money. So if you’re collecting 4% or 5% from, say, REITs or tax-free muni bonds, sit back, relax and smile. You’re in a great place.